Financial resources key to combating food insecurity, malnutrition

By Costantine Akitanda , The Guardian
Published at 05:37 PM Sep 23 2024
news
Photo: Agencies
Around 2.33 billion people experienced moderate to severe food insecurity, with 864 million grappling with severe food insecurity—numbers that underscore the gravity of the global food crisis.

IN July 2024, the global community received a stark wake-up call through the release of ‘The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024’ flagship report.

The extensive report released by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), World Food Porgramme (WFP) and World Health Organization (WHO) shed light on an escalating crisis, the world is drifting further from achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), Targets 2.1 (ending hunger) and 2.2 (eradicating malnutrition). 

The central message is clear—without innovative financing tools and strategies, progress will stall, and the cost of inaction will multiply.

“Financing the gap to ensure food security and nutrition must be our top priority,” states the FAO’s urgent appeal. 

Yet, despite such calls, global hunger and food insecurity are worsening, between 713 and 757 million people faced hunger in 2023—an alarming rise that places the world on a dangerous trajectory.

Despite concerted efforts over the years, food insecurity and malnutrition persist; the report reveals that, in 2023, an additional 152 million people faced hunger compared to 2019. 

Around 2.33 billion people experienced moderate to severe food insecurity, with 864 million grappling with severe food insecurity—numbers that underscore the gravity of the global food crisis.

Economic turmoil, inflation, persistent income inequality, and geopolitical conflicts continue to fuel this crisis. 

The Israel-Palestine conflict, for instance, left 96 percent of Gaza's population acutely food insecure. Climate change also exacerbates these pressures, affecting food production and pushing millions into hunger.

The uneven distribution of food insecurity and malnutrition further compounds the issue, rural communities, low-income countries, women, and marginalized groups bear the heaviest burden. 

Since data was first gathered in 2015, women have consistently experienced higher rates of food insecurity than men, making gender disparity a critical aspect of the crisis.

But what truly stands out is the intricate web of interconnected drivers, political instability, economic fragility, and climate change. Each factor worsens the other, creating a cascade of hardship that traps millions in hunger.

The report identifies a central problem, financing for food security and nutrition is woefully insufficient. Even as international organisations and governments attempt to direct more funds into agriculture and nutrition, these efforts are fragmented and often misaligned with real needs. 

The gap between what is necessary to meet SDG Targets 2.1 and 2.2 and the current available funding is staggering, closing this gap will require investments ranging from USD 176 billion to USD 3.975 trillion by 2030.

The urgency of this financial shortfall cannot be overstated, for the cost of inaction will far outweigh these figures. Hunger is not just a humanitarian issue; it is an economic one that can cripple growth and perpetuate cycles of poverty. 

Still, donor-driven financing often fails to address these concerns, with funds directed toward interests that miss the mark.

Another barrier is the financial constraints faced by many low- and middle-income countries, preventing them from adequately investing in food security and nutrition programs.

But the report does not merely catalogue failures—it offers solutions like blended finance, which marries public and private resources, is highlighted as a key approach to unlocking more investment in food systems. 

Social protection programs, including cash transfers and food vouchers, offer a lifeline for many and need expansion to mitigate the immediate impacts of food insecurity.

Moreover, with climate change disrupting agriculture, investments in climate-resilient food systems are no longer optional—they are essential.

To address this crisis, the report proposes an overhaul of the financial architecture governing food security. 

Governments must adopt integrated food systems that bridge agriculture, health, education, and social protection. This holistic approach will not only tackle food insecurity but will also lay down a sustainable foundation for long-term progress.

There’s also a pressing need to focus resources on the most vulnerable populations—those who have limited access to funding yet face the highest risks. 

The ability to direct financing where it is most needed can be a game-changer in the fight against hunger.

Another critical recommendation is improving data collection and monitoring. Without accurate, reliable data, it is impossible to track progress or ensure that resources are being allocated effectively. 

Transparency in how funds are used will enhance accountability and improve the efficiency of these programs.

Investing in sustainable agriculture is non-negotiable, the future of food production hinges on research, technology, and innovation that support climate-resilient agricultural practices. 

Smallholder farmers, often sidelined, need financing to improve their access to land, technology, and markets, empowering these farmers could transform not only their livelihoods but also global food security.

At the heart of the report is a message of urgency, the current level of financing for food security and nutrition is inadequate and misaligned, without immediate and decisive action, the global community risks perpetuating a cycle of hunger and poverty that will only deepen with time.

This is no longer a matter of charity; it is an economic and social imperative, the report closes with a challenge, daring us to rethink how we fund food security. 

Will we continue to treat hunger as an unfortunate consequence of conflict and climate? Or will we finally act, channeling resources into strategic, sustainable solutions that transform the way we feed the world?

As the numbers rise, so too must the commitment to ending hunger, the answers are there, the question now is whether we have the will to use them.